Technology

Woman holding up iPhones falling in a domino effect

Cell Phones in Court: Court cell phone policies attempt to balance risks with litigants’ needs

by and

Vol. 102 No. 3 (2018) | Crowdsourcing and Data Analytics

A resolution adopted by the Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators in August 2018 (Resolution 7) encourages courts to carefully review and assess their policies for […]

Read More »

David F. Levi

From The Publisher

by

Vol. 102 No. 3 (2018) | Crowdsourcing and Data Analytics

The cover of this edition of Judicature highlights an article, “Crowdsourcing and Data Analytics: The New Settlement Tools,” that proposes a novel use of technology for reducing the time and […]

Read More »

Direction for TAR

Direction for TAR: Guidance for cross-border data transfer under GDPR

by

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

EDRM, the organization that devised the widely used Electronic Discovery Reference Model, has strived to keep e-discovery practitioners up to date on the ever-evolving digital landscape. Its guidance and standards, […]

Read More »

Direction for TAR

Direction for TAR: EDRM Duke Law sets sights on technology assisted review guidance

by

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

An organization that develops models and standards for electronic discovery has set its sights on developing guidance on technology assisted review (TAR) – a process that involves using machine learning […]

Read More »

GDPR: The Next Y2K?

by

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

On July 20, 1999, Congress enacted the “Y2K Act” (Pub. L. No. 106-37) to limit potential litigation caused by computer date-change problems brought on by the year 2000. Many feared […]

Read More »

Continuing to Close the Courthouse Doors?

by

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

The Supreme Court’s October Term 2016 was unusual because from the first Monday in October until the April argument calendar, there were only eight justices on the bench. This affected […]

Read More »

to tweet or not to tweet

To Tweet or Not to Tweet?

by and

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

Social media applications have become ubiquitous in modern communication. But the use of these applications presents unique challenges for judges, who are not only judicial officers but also parents, community […]

Read More »

Cluster Clear

Cluster Clear: Are Clustering Tools the Solution to Tedious Identification and Reduction Processes?

by , and

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

Frontrunners in the costly game of e-discovery have begun to distinguish themselves by using data analytics in creative and effective ways to tackle the critical tasks of identifying key evidence, unearthing […]

Read More »

What will AI mean for you?

by

Vol. 101 No. 3 (2017) | Bold and Persistent Reform

“Artificial Intelligence in the Law” should be the tagline for what’s next in legal technology, if coverage in the legal press is any guide. Lawyers and vendors alike are extolling […]

Read More »

Data Visualization: What Is It? And Can You Trust It?

by

Vol. 101 No. 2 (2017) | Can science save justice?

The legal technology press is replete with articles touting the advantages of Technology Assisted Review (TAR), mostly as a way to streamline the review of electronically stored information (ESI) and […]

Read More »