Technology
Feature
The State of Science in the Courtroom: A Scientist’s Reflections From Conversations With Federal Judges
by Rebekah L. Petroff and Chelsea S. Queen
Vol. 109 No. 1 (2025) | Celebrating a Decade at DukeRebekah Petroff, a scientist who worked at the Federal Judicial Center, examines how judges frequently grapple with making definitive decisions based on uncertain scientific evidence. In September 2023, I entered […]
Feature
Mobilizing the Legal Profession to Defend the Judiciary
Vol. 109 No. 1 (2025) | Celebrating a Decade at DukeIn fall 2024, the Bolch Judicial Institute of Duke Law School hosted a conference as part of its Defending the Judiciary initiative, which aims to mobilize the legal profession to defend […]
Briefs
Technology for Remote and Hybrid Hearings: Lessons From NCSC’s Court Innovation Lab
Vol. 109 No. 1 (2025) | Celebrating a Decade at DukeThe Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ) and Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA) have long underscored the need for technological innovation in the court system, especially the need for courts […]
Feature
Outside the Box: How States Are Increasing Access to Justice Through Evidence-Based Regulation of the Practice of Law
by Rebecca L. Sandefur and Lucy Ricca
Vol. 108 No. 1 (2024) | Harnessing AI for JusticeA new approach to bringing people access to justice “centers the justice experiences of ordinary people, rather than the structure or staffing of justice institutions, the elements of legal families, […]
Feature
How to Harness AI for Justice
by Christopher L. Griffin, Jr., Cas Laskowski and Samuel A. Thumma
Vol. 108 No. 1 (2024) | Harnessing AI for JusticeA Preliminary Agenda for Using Generative AI to Improve Access to Justice
Point/Counterpoint
AI in the Courts: How Worried Should We Be?
by Paul W. Grimm, Cary Coglianese and Maura R. Grossman
Vol. 107 No. 3 (2024) | JustitiaScholars and technologists see both benefits and dangers for AI in the courts. One thing they agree on: AI is here to stay. As we enter 2024, it’s tough not […]
In Conversation
The Battle for Your Brain: A Legal Scholar’s Argument for Protecting Brain Data and Cognitive Liberty
by Paul W. Grimm and Nita A. Farahany
Vol. 107 No. 3 (2024) | JustitiaMindreading may sound like the stuff of science fiction, but these days, as they say, truth is stranger than fiction. Employers track employee attention and even moods. Technology users can […]
Feature
Is Disclosure and Certification of the Use of Generative AI Really Necessary?
by Paul W. Grimm, Maura R. Grossman and Daniel G. Brown*
Vol. 107 No. 2 (2023) | Generative AI in the CourtsThe news abounds with articles on the promises — and perils — of generative AI (GenAI) […]
Feature
Judging Firearms Evidence and the Rule 702 Amendments
by Brandon Garrett, Nicholas Scurich, Eric Tucker and Hannah Bloom
Vol. 107 No. 2 (2023) | Generative AI in the CourtsForensic firearms identification involves linking evidence collected from crime scenes — namely, fired cartridge casings and bullets — to a particular firearm. Two assumptions underlie this identification process: First, firearms […]
Feature
Virtual Voir Dire Works — for Courts and Jurors
Vol. 107 No. 1 (2023) | Toward Fairer, Quicker, Cheaper LitigationAs the COVID-19 pandemic began rolling through the United States, medical staffs were as busy as they had ever been. News reports showed doctors and nurses grabbing quick naps between […]

