| ,

Pew survey examines experiences with, perceptions of state courts

by and

Vol. 109 No. 2 (2025) | Communicating to the People

Throughout the country, people rely on state and local courts to resolve a wide variety of issues, from traffic tickets and divorces to debt cases and shoplifting charges.1 These interactions can affect their lives, their communities, and their opinions of the legal system.

To learn more about how people in the U.S. interact with and view courts, The Pew Charitable Trusts conducted a national poll of 2,016 adults in August and September 2024. The poll, administered by public opinion polling firm SSRS, asked individuals about their general perceptions of the state and local courts in their communities, their interactions with these institutions, and their priorities for improving the courts.2

Across dozens of questions, several key trends emerged. The poll found that one in three U.S. adults live in households that had been involved in a court case at some point, meaning that either the survey respondent or someone living with them had had a civil or criminal case before a state or local court, by either initiating or defending a case.

Many respondents said that this court experience had taken a toll on their mental and financial well-being. Households with court experience graded courts as “D” or “F” twice as often as those without.

Contrary to what people might expect, defendants or those who lose their cases are not the only court users to hold critical views of the courts — the poll found that plaintiffs and winners often do too. For example, almost one in five people who won their cases nevertheless emerged with less confidence in the courts than when they started, and nearly three in 10 said their financial security was harmed.

Still, many saw ways that courts could improve: About half of respondents — across all demographics, both with and without court experience — said that state courts should prioritize their resources for the most serious matters before them, such as those that might break up a family or land someone in prison.

The poll revealed some of the challenges courts face in effectively interacting with the people they serve and highlighted opportunities for meaningful change. Courts and court stakeholders, including policy experts and community advocates, can use the insights from the poll to guide examinations of state and local courts and identify reforms that can make courts work better for individuals and communities.

Bar chart showing that 35% of U.S. adults report that they or someone in their household has had a court case, while 65% report no court experience. Among those with court experience, the most common reasons are traffic tickets (24%) and family matters (23%), followed by other cases (14%), misdemeanors (13%), debt collection (8%), housing problems (7%), felonies (7%), and protection or restraining orders (4%).

One in Three Respondents Said Their Household Has Had a Case in Court

In the U.S., one in three adults — equivalent to 91 million people — reported that a member of their household has had a case in their local court. The most common reasons for having a court case were traffic tickets (24%) and family matters (23%), including child custody matters or divorce, followed by misdemeanors (13%) and debt collection (8%).

Family matters make up only a small share of the cases filed in state and local courts, but because more individuals may be connected to a single case (e.g., grandparents, siblings) and cases may take longer to be resolved, these cases are a common way that people throughout the U.S. interact with courts.

Consumer debt cases and housing disputes such as evictions — civil cases that typically involve relatively small dollar amounts but carry serious financial implications for U.S. adults — were cited as reasons for court involvement by 15% of respondents.3

Grouped bar chart comparing grades given to courts by adults with and without court experience. In both groups, the most common grade is C (38%). Adults with court experience are more likely to give courts a D (16%) or F (10%) than those without court experience (8% D, 3% F). Grades of A and B are less common, and uncertainty is higher among adults without court experience (15%) than those with experience (5%).

Most U.S. Adults Grade Courts as ‘C,’ or Average

More U.S. adults (38%) rate courts as average (“C”) than any other grade. Marks of “A” or “B” were given by about one-third of respondents.

U.S. adults with court experience — meaning that they or a household member have had a court case — were more likely to give a “D” or “F” (26%) grade than those who had no court experience (11%).

Of those who gave “D” or “F” grades, 45% said that they trusted court staff “not at all,” and 42% said that the experience was “very unfair.”

Experiences were slightly more favorable for court navigation and respect. Thirty-seven percent of those who gave courts a “D” or “F” said that they did not receive any respect, and 32% said that navigating court was very hard.

Horizontal bar chart showing changes in confidence in courts after a recent court experience. Overall, most respondents report that their confidence stayed the same, followed by those whose confidence decreased, and a smaller share whose confidence increased. Confidence is more likely to decrease among those who lost their case, while those who won are more likely to report increased confidence.

Court Experience Can Strain Confidence in the Legal System

Having a matter in court (involving either themselves or a member of their household) affected some people’s faith in the institution. About half of respondents said that their confidence in the courts changed after their most recent interaction: 14% said their confidence increased, 35% said it decreased. Half of the respondents (51%) said that their confidence in the courts stayed about the same.

Unsurprisingly, people who lost their cases were more likely than other respondents to report diminished confidence. However, people who won their cases were almost as likely to have lost confidence in the courts (19%) as to have gained confidence (22%), suggesting that the process (not just the outcome) may affect an individual’s confidence.

Horizontal bar chart showing how much respect respondents felt they received from judges and court staff. The largest share report receiving “some” respect (about 39%). Smaller but similar shares report “a lot” of respect and “just a little” respect (each around the low 20% range), while fewer respondents report receiving no respect at all (about 17%).

Most People Report Being Treated With Respect by Court Staff

Although court users cited challenges, most respondents said that court staff treated them with respect, suggesting that challenges are more related to processes than to problems with individual court staff.

Most respondents who reported having had court experience, meaning that they or a household member have had a court case, said that they had received respect from judges and other court staff. Thirty-nine percent said they had received “some” respect, 22% said that they received “a lot,” 23% “just a little,” and 17% said that they received “none at all.”

Opportunities to Improve

All respondents, regardless of whether they had experience with the courts, had similar priorities for making courts more effective. Most want courts to be more user-friendly, especially for people without lawyers, and to prioritize their resources for cases with the most serious consequences.

See the full report at: https://duke.is/statecourtexperience.


Erika Rickard is director and Ruth Rosenthal is project director for the Courts & Communities project at The Pew Charitable Trusts.


1 The Pew Charitable Trusts, State Courts Play a Key Role in American Life, 2024, https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2024/10/state-courts-play-a-key-role-in-american-life.

2 SSRS, Courts and Communities Survey (Survey, commissioned by The Pew Charitable Trusts, 2024).

3 The Pew Charitable Trusts, How Debt Collectors Are Transforming the Business of State Courts, 2020, https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2020/05/how-debt-collectors-are-transforming-the-business-of-state-courts.