Law & Culture

Editors-in-chief

Shattering Glass Mastheads

by and

Vol. 104 No. 1 (2020) | A Clearer View

The nation’s top-ranked law journals have joined together to produce a special-edition law review commemorating a milestone in legal education: For the first time ever, all of the flagship law […]

Read More »

Ariely Background Compressed

What Makes You Think You’re So Smart?

by

Vol. 104 No. 1 (2020) | A Clearer View

In recent years, scholars have taken new interest in people’s ability to reason rationally. The conventional take from economic theory is that, as rationally motivated individuals, people generally make appropriate […]

Read More »

Getting Hotter: Climate Change in the Courts

by and

Vol. 104 No. 1 (2020) | A Clearer View

POINT / COUNTERPOINT Climate change has taken center stage politically and socially. As fires raged in Australia, glaciers continued a steady melt, and the winter of 2020 tracked to become […]

Read More »

I Recommend: In Hoffa’s Shadow

by

|

I recently finished listening to Jack Goldsmith’s recent book, In Hoffa’s Shadow. I highly recommend it. Professor Goldsmith is on the Harvard Law School faculty and is one of our […]

Read More »

I Recommend: Theodore Roosevelt for the Defense

by

|

Ask any American today what the trial of the century was, and you will likely get varying answers, ranging from OJ Simpson to Paul Manafort. However, ask any New York […]

Read More »

I Recommend: The Body Keeps the Score

by

|

The book that has recently altered my approach to others and to my work is The Body Keeps the Score by neuroscientist Bessel Van der Kolk. The book summarizes, for […]

Read More »

piece of cake?

Piece of Cake?

by and

Vol. 102 No. 1 (2018) | Forensic Fail

POINT / COUNTERPOINT A baker refuses to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple because of his religious views on same-sex marriage. The couple claims the baker’s refusal violates […]

Read More »

jHealth

JHEALTH: How the Tenth Circuit is Improving the Health and Performance of Federal Judges

by , and

Vol. 102 No. 1 (2018) | Forensic Fail

Being a judge offers many benefits — prestige, intellectual stimulation, autonomy, and the opportunity to provide a community service. But the simple fact is that being a judge does not […]

Read More »

How lockhart Really Should have been decided: Canons of Construction are Key

How Lockhart Really Should Have Been Decided: Canons of Construction Are Key

by

Vol. 102 No. 1 (2018) | Forensic Fail

In the winter 2017 issue of this journal, my friend and colleague Professor Joseph Kimble undertook an interesting exercise: rewriting the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Lockhart v. United States1 […]

Read More »

Decoding GDPR

Decoding GDPR: Familiar Terms Could Cause Major Confusion When GDPR Takes Effect

by

Vol. 102 No. 1 (2018) | Forensic Fail

On May 25, 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) takes effect, replacing the aged European Data Protection Directive created in the year 1995. GDPR intends to harmonize data-protection laws […]

Read More »