Federal Courts

Labrier an example of new proportionality rules at work

by

Vol. 100 No. 3 (2016) | Who appointed me god?

In December 2015, the amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b) took effect. These amendments, highlighted in Judicature’s Winter 2015 issue, moved the proportionality provisions from Rule 26(b)(2)(C)(iii), as a limit on discovery, […]

Read More »

The Fluidity of Judicial Coalitions

by , and

Vol. 100 No. 3 (2016) | Who appointed me god?

A surprising look at coalitions within the supreme courts of the United States and Indiana In June 2001, the United States Supreme Court decided three closely watched deportation cases by […]

Read More »

The U.S. Constitution and Judicial Qualifications: A Curious Omission

by

Vol. 100 No. 4 (2016) | Steady As She Goes

The Constitution carefully spells out qualifications for President and members of Congress, but is virtually silent with regard to judicial qualifications. Why? It is common knowledge that, under Article II of […]

Read More »

Guidelines & Best Practices for Implementing the 2015 Discovery Amendments to Achieve Proportionality

by

Vol. 100 No. 4 (2016) | Steady As She Goes

The Winter 2016 edition of Judicature originally contained excerpts from the Guidelines and Best Practices Guidelines & Best Practices for Implementing the 2015 Discovery Amendments to Achieve Proportionality report published by […]

Read More »

A Report from the Proportionality Roadshow

by and

Vol. 100 No. 4 (2016) | Steady As She Goes

Recommendations from the Bench and Bar in 17 Cities on Implementing the 2015 Proportionality Amendments 6 MONTHS. 17 CITIES. 20,000 MILES. From November 2015 to May 2016, the “Proportionality Roadshow” […]

Read More »

Cross Border Discovery at a Crossroads

by

Vol. 100 No. 4 (2016) | Steady As She Goes

Along with explosive globalization, including the ease with which parties can conduct business abroad, there has been a concomitant need for international legal systems to consider exchange of information across […]

Read More »

A Model of Collegiality: Judge Harry T. Edwards

by , and

Vol. 105 No. 1 (2021) | The Courts Held

One of Judge Harry Edwards’s successors as chief judge of the D.C. Circuit has called Judge Edwards the “Great Chief.” That is a fitting appellation. While Judge Edwards could serve […]

Read More »

Sandra Day O’Connor’s “First” Principles: A Constructive Vision for an Angry Nation

by

Vol. 105 No. 1 (2021) | The Courts Held

Once upon a time in American public life, there were figures who achieved universal admiration. It was even possible to earn the trust of those with whom one disagreed. Justice […]

Read More »

Academic Feeder Judges: Are clerkships the key to academia?

by

Vol. 105 No. 1 (2021) | The Courts Held

Click here to download this article’s accompanying appendix. The legal community is familiar with “feeder judges” — federal lower-court (primarily court of appeals) judges who have a substantial number of […]

Read More »

Person marking paper with red pen

At Least Do The Easy Stuff

by

Vol. 105 No. 1 (2021) | The Courts Held

In these two examples, I have done very little rewriting. I simply used plain words and cut unnecessary words (including the egregiously unnecessary parentheticals). And in the second one, I […]

Read More »