Technology
Briefs
Cell Phones in Court: Court cell phone policies attempt to balance risks with litigants’ needs
by William Raftery and Deborah W. Smith
Vol. 102 No. 3 (2018) | Crowdsourcing and Data AnalyticsA resolution adopted by the Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators in August 2018 (Resolution 7) encourages courts to carefully review and assess their policies for […]
From the Publisher
From The Publisher
Vol. 102 No. 3 (2018) | Crowdsourcing and Data AnalyticsThe cover of this edition of Judicature highlights an article, “Crowdsourcing and Data Analytics: The New Settlement Tools,” that proposes a novel use of technology for reducing the time and […]
Feature
Unlocking the e-discovery TAR blackbox
Vol. 102 No. 2 (2018) | Rights That Made The World RightEDRM at Duke Law has published a proposed set of e-discovery guidelines that explain technology assisted review (TAR), also known as predictive coding and computer assisted review, and is now […]
Point/Counterpoint
To Tweet or Not to Tweet?
by Barbara Berenson and Douglas Nazarian
Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?Social media applications have become ubiquitous in modern communication. But the use of these applications presents unique challenges for judges, who are not only judicial officers but also parents, community […]
Perspective
Continuing to Close the Courthouse Doors?
Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?The Supreme Court’s October Term 2016 was unusual because from the first Monday in October until the April argument calendar, there were only eight justices on the bench. This affected […]
Feature
Cluster Clear: Are Clustering Tools the Solution to Tedious Identification and Reduction Processes?
by George Socha, Adam Strayer and Heena Shaikh
Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?Frontrunners in the costly game of e-discovery have begun to distinguish themselves by using data analytics in creative and effective ways to tackle the critical tasks of identifying key evidence, unearthing […]
Briefs
Direction for TAR: Guidance for cross-border data transfer under GDPR
by Rhys Dipshan
Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?EDRM, the organization that devised the widely used Electronic Discovery Reference Model, has strived to keep e-discovery practitioners up to date on the ever-evolving digital landscape. Its guidance and standards, […]
Briefs
Direction for TAR: EDRM Duke Law sets sights on technology assisted review guidance
Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?An organization that develops models and standards for electronic discovery has set its sights on developing guidance on technology assisted review (TAR) – a process that involves using machine learning […]
Briefs
GDPR: The Next Y2K?
Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?On July 20, 1999, Congress enacted the “Y2K Act” (Pub. L. No. 106-37) to limit potential litigation caused by computer date-change problems brought on by the year 2000. Many feared […]
Feature
What will AI mean for you?
by George Socha
Vol. 101 No. 3 (2017) | Bold and Persistent Reform“Artificial Intelligence in the Law” should be the tagline for what’s next in legal technology, if coverage in the legal press is any guide. Lawyers and vendors alike are extolling […]