Point/Counterpoint

,

The Docket Debate

by and

Vol. 108 No. 1 (2024) | Harnessing AI for Justice

Emergency appeals to the Supreme Court are on the rise, giving way to more and more cases in which the Court skips the processes that help explain its work. Is […]

Read More »

AI in the Courts: How Worried Should We Be?

by , and

Vol. 107 No. 3 (2024) | Justitia

Scholars and technologists see both benefits and dangers for AI in the courts. One thing they agree on: AI is here to stay. As we enter 2024, it’s tough not […]

Read More »

Originalism Is Dead. Long Live Originalism.

by and

Vol. 107 No. 2 (2023) | Generative AI in the Courts

Can common good constitutionalism replace originalism? Has originalism run its course? Yes, says Harvard Law Professor Adrian Vermeule in Common Good Constitutionalism (Polity Press, 2022), which advocates for the book’s titular theory […]

Read More »

You Are Being Scanned

by , and

Vol. 106 No. 3 (2023) | Forging New Trails

It’s 1890. Responding in part to the invention of “instantaneous” photography, Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis write The Right to Privacy, urging legal recognition of “the right to be let alone,” which […]

Read More »

U.S. dollars in a jar

Discovery Cost Shifting: Has Its Time Come?

by and

Vol. 99 No. 2 (2015) | The Mass-Tort MDL Vortex

Since at least 1990, a few courts have shifted payment of discovery costs to the requesting party either under their general case- management authority or as part of a Rule 26 […]

Read More »

,

Doing Discovery Right

by and

Vol. 99 No. 1 (2015) | The View from the Bench

Judge Leon Holmes and Magistrate Judge Craig Shaffer compare the merits of proactive versus passive pretrial judicial discovery management. Significant proposed discovery amendments will take effect on Dec. 1, 2015, […]

Read More »

Claims-Made Class-Action Settlements

by and

Vol. 99 No. 3 (2015) | Fixing Discovery

Many of us have received notice, by mail or by newspaper, of a class-action settlement on behalf of consumers who may unwittingly be claimants in a suit asserting that a […]

Read More »

,

Criticizing the Court: How opinionated should opinions be?

by and

Vol. 105 No. 3 (2021) | Leaving Afghanistan

The Supreme Court is, naturally, supreme. And in the vast majority of cases, lower courts dutifully enforce the law handed down by the Court without criticism or conversation. Sometimes, however, […]

Read More »

Point Counterpoint , , ,

Jurors Asking Questions

by and

Vol. 100 No. 1 (2016) | 100 Years of Judicature

In some courtrooms, the practice of allowing jurors to pose questions to witnesses is gaining traction. Questioning witnesses allows jurors to clarify information and better understand the evidence and arguments […]

Read More »

Point Counterpoint ,

Point-Counterpoint: Rethinking Mandatory Disclosure

by and

Vol. 100 No. 2 (2016) | A Judge in Public Life

In 1991, the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules published for public comment proposed amendments to FRCP 26(a)(1) that would mandate disclosure of documents and tangible things that “significantly bear on […]

Read More »