Briefs

Justice Dikgang Moseneke ,

A Freedom Fighter and Judicial Luminary: 2020 Bolch Prize Honors Dikgang Moseneke of the South Africa Constitutional Court

by

Vol. 104 No. 1 (2020) | A Clearer View

Dikgang Moseneke, an internationally revered jurist who helped build and lead a democratic South Africa as it emerged from apartheid, has been named the recipient of the 2020 Bolch Prize […]

Read More »

Editors-in-chief

Shattering Glass Mastheads

by and

Vol. 104 No. 1 (2020) | A Clearer View

The nationā€™s top-ranked law journals have joined together to produce a special-edition law review commemorating a milestone in legal education: For the first time ever, all of the flagship law […]

Read More »

preparing for a pandemic ,

Preparing Courts for a Pandemic

by

Vol. 104 No. 1 (2020) | A Clearer View

As the coronavirus emerged around the globe early this year, it quickly began to affect every facet of society and government, including state courts. Unlike in prior instances of mass […]

Read More »

Self driving car going down the road ,

The Cars of the Future are Headed to Your Courtroom

by

Vol. 103 No. 3 (2019) | Fees, Fines, and Bail

Distracted and intoxicated driving are costly problems. And while emerging technologies aim to help reduce traffic accidents caused by human error, technology may also increase the number of accidents. For […]

Read More »

States Continue to Experiment with Partisan Judicial Elections

by

Vol. 103 No. 1 (2019) | Navigating Rough Seas

2019 marks the fourth consecutive year of unusually high interest among the states in shifting from partisan to nonpartisan, or from nonpartisan to partisan, judicial elections. It began in 2015, […]

Read More »

Cartoon image of a judge ,

The Disappearing Probate Court

by

Vol. 103 No. 2 (2019) | Pay NCAA athletes?

In 1967, Maine voters amended the state constitution to authorize the elimination of the stateā€™s county-controlled, county-operated, county-funded Probate Courts.[1] In 2019, the Maine legislature debated a ā€œconcept draftā€ enabling […]

Read More »

Woman holding up iPhones falling in a domino effect , ,

Cell Phones in Court: Court cell phone policies attempt to balance risks with litigantsā€™ needs

by and

Vol. 102 No. 3 (2018) | Crowdsourcing and Data Analytics

A resolution adopted by the Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators in August 2018 (Resolution 7) encourages courts to carefully review and assess their policies for […]

Read More »

Direction for TAR

Direction for TAR: Guidance for cross-border data transfer under GDPR

by

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

EDRM, the organization that devised the widely used Electronic Discovery Reference Model, has strived to keep e-discovery practitioners up to date on the ever-evolving digital landscape. Its guidance and standards, […]

Read More »

Direction for TAR

Direction for TAR: EDRM Duke Law sets sights on technology assisted review guidance

by

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

An organization that develops models and standards for electronic discovery has set its sights on developing guidance on technology assisted review (TAR) ā€“ a process that involves using machine learning […]

Read More »

GDPR: The Next Y2K?

by

Vol. 101 No. 4 (2017) | Equal opportunity?

On July 20, 1999, Congress enacted the ā€œY2K Actā€ (Pub. L. No. 106-37) to limit potential litigation caused by computer date-change problems brought on by the year 2000. Many feared […]

Read More »